The University Grants Commission (UGC) in India provides guidelines for performance appraisal systems in higher education institutions.
1. Criteria for Evaluation:
Teaching Excellence: Evaluation of teaching effectiveness, innovation in teaching methodologies, and student feedback.
Research and Publications: Assessment of research output, publications in reputed journals, and participation in conferences.
Extension Activities: Contribution to community engagement, social outreach, and involvement in extension activities.
Professional Development: Participation in workshops, seminars, and conferences for skill enhancement.
2. Student Feedback:
Collection and analysis of feedback from students on the quality of teaching and learning experiences.
3. Peer Review:
Evaluation by peers within the institution or external experts to ensure an unbiased assessment.
4. Research Output:
Consideration of the quantity and quality of research publications, grants secured, and patents filed.
5. Administrative Contributions:
Assessment of administrative roles and responsibilities undertaken by faculty members.
6. Self-assessment:
Encouragement for faculty to conduct self-assessment and reflect on their professional development.
7. Weightage for Performance Indicators:
Defining the weightage assigned to different performance indicators to ensure a comprehensive evaluation.
8. Performance Metrics and Documentation:
Use of specific metrics and documentation to measure and record performance.
9. Continuous Professional Development:
Emphasis on the need for continuous professional development and staying updated in the field.
10. Feedback and Improvement:
A system for providing constructive feedback and mechanisms for improvement based on the appraisal.
Performance Appraisal system | |
UGC guide lines PBAS | |
2018-19 ASAR scores | |
2019-20 ASAR scores | |
2020-21 ASAR scores | |
2021-22 ASAR scores | |
2022-23 ASAR scores |